Journey's Weekly Homilies
24 December
2001, Christmas Eve Cycle A
Homily by Joe
Isaiah 9:1-6
Titus 2:11-14
Luke 2:1-20
I don’t
know about you, but this year I am so ready for it to be
Christmas again. I may not have been at Wal-Mart at 5 am on the
day after Thanksgiving, but I have put aside my angry young
liturgist persona and I’ve given myself over to the rhythms,
rhymes and rituals of the season. And I’m guessing that the
Noels – news – you want to hear are not the latest
developments in Biblical hermeneutics or archaeology. If you’re
like me you’re longing for those tidings of comfort and joy that
have been so hard to come by lately. So let’s go back to the
beginning.
“The
first Noel the angels did say was to certain poor shepherds in
fields as they lay.” Strictly speaking the shepherds were the
only people for whom the angelic tidings have ever been
“news.” And “poor shepherds” is a redundancy of the
highest order. Shepherds were the poorest of the poor, scratching
out a living from their animals and the earth. The wandering,
outdoor, twenty-four-hours-a-day nature of their work meant they
had very little social standing; they were morally suspect because
they couldn’t protect their families at night. In a Jewish
society they were further discredited because they couldn’t
observe the purity codes. The shepherds seem an odd choice to
receive the angelic tidings because they could be expected to have
little interest in whether King Herod or a descendant of David sat
on the throne. When you’re a peasant, your concerns are more
immediate.
But this is
Luke’s story to tell and so the angels are sent to the
shepherds. One of my favorite Christmas cards is a cartoon drawn
from a perspective above two angels who are themselves hovering
over some unsuspecting shepherds. One angel is holding a trumpet
and saying to the other “watch this.” The classic angelic
encounter follows: we have the awestruck witnesses, the belated
admonition “fear not” and the proclamation of the good news.
And the good news even includes a confirmation code, if you will:
“if you don’t believe me, go and see for yourself.”
And the
shepherds do go, somehow find the baby, and are astonished by what
they see. “Shepherds, why this jubilee?” Luke tells us only
that when the saw the baby they rejoiced with “exceeding great
joy,” told everyone around about it (and so became the first
evangelists), and returned “glorifying and praising God for all
that they had seen and heard.” The French composer Olivier
Messiaen wrote a piece depicting the shepherds on their way back
from the manger. He gives them an odd little tune to pipe, full of
irregular rhythms as if they are half stumbling and half dancing,
transported by their experience.
So what was
this amazing thing the shepherds saw? I know I said I wasn’t
going to do this, but social historians tell us that a swaddled
baby in a manger wasn’t all that uncommon a sight. Swaddling was
a widely practiced procedure, believed to help the baby’s
growth. Houses for the poorer classes were often just one large
room; the people at one end and their animals at the other. A baby
in a manger would be like a child in our time sleeping in a
dresser drawer. It happens.
In Luke’s
gospel Jesus is sent to, and recognized by, persons who cut across
the grain of conventional expectations. And so in his telling
these lowly shepherds have eyes to see and ears to hear what
others cannot. They are able to grasp the concept of a new
relationship between God and humankind, to feel the presence of a
God no longer remote and isolated but able to identify with human
suffering and longing. “And the word was made flesh,” as
John’s gospel puts it. The incarnation, as we call it, sounds
like such a lofty concept, but try translating the latin root,
carne, as we do in “carnival” and you get “and the word was
made meat.” I don’t find this the most attractive image, but
it has a certain visceral quality that fits Luke’s storytelling
purpose. Jesus is conceived by the Holy Spirit to be sure, but
still comes into the world through the birth canal, among all the
bodily fluids, into a place with no running water, born to a woman
away from her home without her kinswomen to assist with the birth
(I can’t imagine Joseph was much help), in the bleakness of
poverty and under the shadow of tyranny. This is God among not
apart from us, sharing to the full the human experience, knowing
hunger and cold, enjoying touch and taste, crying out for love;
the “hopes and fears of all the years.”
It is this
sensuous quality that makes Christmas such an ideal winter
festival. The long nights, dream time, are relieved by appeals to
all the senses: we experience the bright lights, the smell of fir,
the sound of the carols, the taste of eggnog, and of course the
nostalgia built up from every Christmas we’ve celebrated. The
engagement of emotions and senses is right in keeping with the
theme of the god who shares all those hopes and fears.
Was this what the shepherds recognized when they stumbled into just the right house, stable or whatever? Perhaps, but we can only speculate; there are too many intangibles and we can’t see through their eyes. But consider that all across our city tonight Christians are gathering together just like we are; to an unchurched observer all the gatherings must look pretty much the same. But to our ears and eyes and hands and hearts this gathering is special, even if we’re the only ones who see that, and there’s nowhere we’d rather be. This, of all the churches in Portland, is our home. So when we circle around the table to sing The Winter Name of God, when our eyes meet as we pass the plate and the cup, when we share hospitality and good will, we too, though we may half dance and half stumble, send back the song which now the angels sing.